CITY OF ALTURAS
2004 Consumer Confidence Report
MAY 10, 2005
We test the drinking water quality for many constituents as required by State and Federal Regulations. This report shows the results of our monitoring for the period of January 1 - December 31, 2004.
Este informe contiene información muy importante sobre su agua beber. Tradúzcalo ó hable con alguien que lo entienda bien.
|
Type of water source(s) in use: |
4 deep wells |
||||
|
Name & location of source(s): |
South Fork Pit River Sub-basin |
||||
|
Time and place of regularly scheduled board meetings for public participation: |
Alturas City Council |
||||
|
Meetings, 7:00 PM on 2nd Tuesday of month at 200 W. North Street, Alturas CA |
|||||
|
For more information, contact: |
Stacy Chase |
Phone: |
(530) 233-2377 |
||
|
TERMS USED IN THIS REPORT : |
|||||
|
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) : The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLs are set as close to the PHGs (or MCLGs) as is economically and technologically feasible. Secondary MCLs are set to protect the odor, taste, and appearance of drinking water.Primary Drinking Water Standards (PDWS): MCLs for contaminants that affect health along with their monitoring and reporting requirements, and water treatment requirements. Secondary Drinking Water Standards (SDWS): MCLs for contaminants that affect taste, odor, or appearance of the drinking water. Contaminants with SDWSs do not affect the health at the MCL levels. ND: not detectable at testing limit ppm: parts per million or milligrams per liter (mg/L) ppb: parts per billion or micrograms per liter (ug/L) ppt: parts per trillion or nanograms per liter (ng/L) pCi/L: picocuries per liter (a measure of radiation) Public Health Goal (PHG): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. PHGs are set by the California Environmental Protection Agency. |
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) : The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL): The level of a disinfectant added for water treatment that may not be exceeded at the consumer’s tap. Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (MRDLG): The level of a disinfectant added for water treatment below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs are set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Treatment Technique (TT): A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water Regulatory Action Level (AL): The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements which a water system must follow. Variances and Exemptions: Department permission to exceed an MCL or not comply with a treatment technique under certain conditions. Level detected: The average for the 4 city wells |
||||
The sources of drinking water
(both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material, and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity.Contaminants that may be present in source water include:
In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, USEPA and the state Department of Health Services (Department) prescribe regulations that limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. Department regulations also establish limits for contaminants in bottled water that must provide the same protection for public health.
Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4 list all of the drinking water contaminants that were detected during the most recent sampling for the constituent. The presence of these contaminants in the water does not necessarily indicate that the water poses a health risk. The Department requires us to monitor for certain contaminants less than once per year because the concentrations of these contaminants are not expected to vary significantly from year to year. Some of the data, though representative of the water quality, are more than one year old.
|
Table 1 - sampling results showing the detection of coliform bacteria |
|||||||||||||||
|
Microbiological Contaminants |
Highest No. of detections |
No. of months in violation |
MCL |
PHG (MCLG) |
Typical Source of Bacteria |
||||||||||
Total Coliform Bacteria |
0 |
0 |
More than 1 sample in a month with a detection |
0 (0) |
Naturally present in the environment |
||||||||||
|
Table 2 - sampling results showing the detection of Lead and copper |
|||||||||||||||
|
Lead and Copper (and reporting units) |
No. of samples collected |
90th percentile level detected |
No. Sites exceeding AL |
AL |
PHG (MCLG) |
Typical Source of Contaminant |
|||||||||
Lead (ppb) |
20 |
ND |
0 |
15 |
2 (N/A) |
Internal corrosion of household water plumbing systems; erosion of natural deposits; discharges from industrial manufacturers. |
|||||||||
Copper (ppm) |
20 |
0.050 |
0 |
1.3 |
0.17 (N/A) |
Internal corrosion of household water plumbing systems; erosion of natural deposits; leaching from wood preservatives. |
|||||||||
|
TAble 3 - sampling results for sodium and hardness |
|||||||||||||||
|
Chemical or Constituent |
Sample Date |
Highest Level Detected |
Range of Detections |
MCL |
PHG (MCLG) |
Typical Source of Contaminant |
|||||||||
Sodium (ppm) |
4/28/03 |
34 |
14 - 34 |
none |
None (None) |
Generally found in ground and surface water |
|||||||||
Hardness (CaCO3) (ppm) |
4/28/03 |
162 |
53 - 162 |
none |
None (None) |
Generally found in ground and surface water |
|||||||||
|
TAble 4 - detection of contaminants with a Primary Drinking Water Standard |
|||||||||||||||
|
Chemical or Constituent |
Sample Date |
Highest Level Detected |
Range of Detections |
MCL |
PHG (MCLG) |
Typical Source of Contaminant |
|||||||||
Arsenic (ppb) |
7/22/02 |
7.9 |
4.6 – 7.9 |
50 |
0.004 (N/A) |
Naturally present in the environment |
|||||||||
Chromium (ppb) |
7/22/02 |
1.8 |
1.2 – 1.8 |
N/A |
N/A (100) |
Discharge from steel & pulp mills & chrome plating; erosion of natural deposits |
|||||||||
Gross Alpha Activity (pCi/l) |
4/10/01 |
4.8 |
nd – 4.8 |
15 |
N/A (0) |
Naturally present in the environment |
|||||||||
Nitrate (NO3) (ppm) |
11/01/04 |
12.3 |
2.9 – 12.3 |
45 |
45 (N/A) |
Runoff and leaching from fertilizer use; leaching from septic tanks, sewage; erosion of natural deposits |
|||||||||
|
TAble 5 - detection of unregulated contaminants |
|||||||||||||||
|
Chemical |
Sample Date |
Highest Level Detected |
Range of Detections |
AL |
PHG (MCLG) |
Typical Source of Contaminant |
|||||||||
Hexavalent Chromium (ppb) |
9/17/02 |
1.5 |
1.0 – 1.5 |
N/A |
N/A (N/A) |
Discharge from steel & pulp mills & chrome plating; erosion of natural deposits |
|||||||||
Vanadium (ppb) |
9/12/2002 |
26 |
13 - 26 |
50 |
N/A (N/A) |
Runoff/leaching from natural deposits |
|||||||||
Drinking Water Source Assessment information:
The California Department of Health Services completed source water assessments on the City’s four wells in April 2002. The sources are considered most vulnerable to the following activities not associated with any detected contaminants:
Automobile – gas stations
Injection wells/dry wells/sumps
Underground injection of commercial/industrial discharges
Contractor or government agency equipment storage yards
Funeral services/graveyards
Housing – high density (>1 house/0.5 acres)
Motor pools
Wells – water supply
Historic gas stations
The sources are considered most vulnerable to the following activities associated with nitrate detected in the water supply:
Fertilizer/ pesticide/herbicide application
Septic systems – low density (<1/acre)
Sewer collection systems
Nitrate is believed to be associated with runoff and leaching from fertilizer use; leaching from septic tanks and sewage; and erosion of natural deposits.
A copy of the complete assessment may be viewed at:
City of Alturas
200 North Street
Alturas, CA 96101
You may request a summary of the assessments be sent to you by contacting
Sandi Tenney
Associate Sanitary Engineer
530.224.4800
Additional General Information On Drinking Water
All drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that the water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the USEPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1-800-426-4791).
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immuno-compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. USEPA/Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1-800-426-4791).
MTBE: Each of the four wells was tested quarterly in 2001 for MTBE. Wells 5 & 7 were again tested quarterly in 2003. No MTBE has been detected in our water.
Arsenic: While your drinking water meets the current standard for arsenic, it does contain low levels of arsenic. The standard balances the current understanding of arsenic’s possible health effects against the cost of removing arsenic from drinking water. The California Department of Health Services continues to research the health effects of low levels of arsenic, which is a mineral known to cause cancer in humans at high concentrations and is linked to other health effects such as skin damage and other circulatory problems.